收藏著錄@#@秘殿珠林續編(乾清宮),頁158-159@#@@#@收藏著錄@#@故宮書畫錄(卷八),第四冊,頁85@#@@#@收藏著錄@#@故宮書畫圖錄,第八冊,頁289-290@#@@#@參考書目@#@1.〈明吳彬畫十六羅漢〉,收入國立故宮博物院編,《晚明變形主義畫家作品展》(臺北:國立故宮博物院,1977年九月初版),頁254。
2.陳韻如,《因吳彬佛教人物畫風研究》,國立台灣大學藝術史研究所碩士論文,1996年。
3.李玉珉,〈明末羅漢畫中的貫休傳統及其影響〉,《故宮學術季刊》,第二十二卷第一期(2004年秋),頁99-143。
4.陳韻如;〈(傳)明吳彬畫羅漢 軸〉,收入何傳馨主編,《狀奇怪非人間 吳彬的繪畫世界》(臺北:國立故宮博物院,2012年十月初版),頁180-181。
@#@@#@內容簡介(中文)@#@此為成組十六羅漢軸之一,畫幅左側有款題「莆田吳彬敬摹貫休上人筆意」,並鈐有「臣彬」印,雖符合吳彬曾入畫院的記錄,但書風略顯不同,推測是後人仿作。另若從畫中樹幹的造型與吳彬手法有關而言,不能排除吳彬曾作此類羅漢畫組的可能。吳彬的其他羅漢畫風,雖少見貫休古樣,但從中汲取創新養分的可能性很高。
(20121018)@#@@#@內容簡介(英文)@#@This is one of a set of sixteen lohan (arthat) hanging scroll paintings. At the left is a signature that reads, “Wu Bin of Putian reverently copied the brush idea of Guanxiu,” accompanied by the seal “Your Servant Bin.” Although this accords with a record of Wu Bin having once served at the Painting Academy, the style here differs somewhat, suggesting a later imitation. Nonetheless, the shape of the branches in the works accords with Wu Bin’s methods, indicating the possibility that he may have done such a set of lohan paintings. Although Wu’s lohan painting style does not often reveal the archaic manner of Guanxiu, the possibility that he was inspired to creativity by Guanxiu’s style is quite high.
(20121018)